• @MagosInformaticus
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    make reapportion something that happens every 10 years with the census

    That’s… the current state of affairs? New apportionments of Rep seats to states take effect on the 4th year of each decade and have done so consistently since 1933 and in particular the 1929 Permanent Apportionment Act. It also does little for the major structural issues with voting, which are much more about voting method and the drawing of voting district lines.

    • @mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      The 1929 law prevents the total number of Congressmen from changing. Adjusting the number of Congressmen is called reapportionment. What you’re talking about is just redistricting.

    • @Ranvier
      link
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think the person above you is trying to talk about the number of house representatives being frozen but just phrased it a little vaguely. You’re right that reapportionment happens every ten years, but the number of reps got capped at 435 in the early 20th century. It used to grow with population.

      Because a state gets a minimum of one house vote, this means that states with at large representatives like Wyoming or Montana are often representing less people than bigger states. If we allowed the number of reps to grow again, it could be made more proportional to actual population and lessen the distortion from having a minimum of one representative creates. It would also lessen the electoral college advantage that small states currently have, since the electoral votes for larger states would go up while for smaller states they would stay the same. Giving Washington DC and Puerto Rico proper representation would help too. All of this would get closer to one person one vote for president, though still with the winner take all system causing issues as you point out. There’s a lot to fix.