• Woozythebear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The problem with Arc cards is that they are a great budget option but don’t work on budget computers. I was planning on pairing an arc 380 with a i7 6700k for a little budget gaming machine but the card doesn’t work without ReBar. So who are these cards for? Who is pairing a $100-200 GPU with a $200 cpu?

    I don’t know how they plan to compete in the budget market if people are better off buying an 8 year old GTX 1060 then they are buying a new arc card.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Intel seemed to fall behind kinda hard w/ regards to CPU/Motherboard features until much later on. Supposing you aren’t working with parts you already have, everything from 1st generation Ryzen onwards would have rebar support. They can be had very cheaply too, and work on any AM4 board.

      You may also find a BIOS update allows some older chipsets to support rebar. It’s a tad flaky depending on the manufacturer though.

    • monkeyman512@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They didn’t WANT to make budget cards. They wanted mid/high end cards but fell short. But it’s better to sell at a lower price then to completely eat the cost for hardware they already made.

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Alchemist is barely more than a proof of concept. Until they got DirectX to Vulkan translation really going, the performance in a lot of titles was kind of a joke.

      A gen 1 product only ever makes sense in hyper-specific use-cases, but a lot of the pieces for something really neat and much more widely useful, are there.

      Alchemist cards weren’t gamechangers. But they’ve proved that with time and some more RnD, ARC can be.