• hydropticOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    They sorta have to be aggressive because it’s damn near impossible to get people to pay for online services nowadays. Everybody expects to get everything for free, but also nobody wants to see ads (for a good reason too, mind you.)

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, I wish they would push a different model. I think the charity model is likely unsustainable long term. Quality contributions to the information should buy you some access and perhaps everyone gets access to some basic info on entries but more in depth data requires a micropayment perhaps.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It would get infested with bots writing articles and other bots upvoting the quality status. The people with resources to do that wouldn’t have any interest in telling the truth.

      • hydropticOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Unfortunately that’d probably kill it ded; like I said, people are really loath to pay for online services.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        PAYWALL WIKIPEDIA?!

        How dare you sir!

        They take heat for fundraising like they’re on the edge although they have full coffers. Hopefully it’s sustainable!