• Sagar Acharya
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Every open source software has a maintainer. In case of it being maintained by ‘community’, it is maintained by a person who pretends all are included.

    • rollingflower@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      This. There nearly never is a community, at least in practice. Bigger projects have different roles, but its mostly “if you dont know how to code, you are likely not helping”

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The more I read about these small, but important projects and their problems, the more I think there should be a fund/foundation to systemically support such projects. Yes, we have the Linux Foundation, but it doesn’t seem to do what I have in mind (maybe for a good reason).

      Open Source software is often enough infrastructure. Linux, OpenSSL, Curl, Apache, etc. are de facto public infrastructure. If any of those would have a severe problem, the economy would literally collapse.

      • Sagar Acharya
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Linux kernel is a time sharing system. It’s basic task is to have a list of processes, allocate them to the processor and manage memory by converting physical to logical. This has been done ages ago by devs.

        Every piece of software, and especially server host has a maintainer. They are responsible for everything. In this world of cyber offenses, to evade this, they use cloud or say “community” maintains this.