A community index of servers added a new rule recently, that requires every participant to defederate from Threads. Some admins are unhappy.

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

  • voxel
    3124·
    9 months ago

    I’m kinda against defederation or blocking anything at an instance level, unless the instance causes straight up legal issues or is literally created for the sole purpose of harassment

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      135·
      9 months ago

      Well, I think Threads meets your litmus test requirements.

      It is a certainty that Threads will heavily influence the future development of Activity Pub. This will inevitibly lead to the corporatization and enshittification of any service Threads can affect.

      The only resistance we can offer against this is defederation and noncompliance with the will of the behemoth.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        44·
        9 months ago

        You’re missing the point. Fedi Garden is threatening to defederate from anyone who doesn’t defederate from Threads.

        Imagine if other instances start doing this about things that aren’t threads. “Delist from db0 or world will delist you”, “delist from Lemmy.ca or Lemmy.ml will delist you.”

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          21·
          9 months ago

          I understand your “what if” scenarios, but this is an existential crisis that needs to be resisted against with all instances working in concert. This is not a “what if” scenario. This is the actual iceberg and it is big enough to ruin the fediverse for all instances, no matter their affiliation with the garden.

          So, we either unite to defend the independence of the fediverse, or we let a corporate giant take it by ovewhelming us with their “important updates for your security” until we are all assimilated.