• Synnr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    This only works if you don’t want the privacy enhancing aspect of advertisers not tying your activity to an IP address.

    Beyond more safely using open Wi-Fi or bypassing a censoring ISP, there isn’t much reason there.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s debatable. In my estimation, by using a “service vpn” you’re giving advertisers some other kind of demographic information, namely that you’re the kind of person that pays for a vpn.

      • Synnr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Is that better or worse than giving advertisers the data point that you’re high-tech knowledgable and browse personal accounts from a server in a datacenter?

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, that’s why I think it’s debatable. It’s a lot easier to make those decisions on traffic coming from a known vpn ip, versus all vps providers in the world - many of which have corporate uses.

          On the other hand - if you’re smart enough to set up a vpn, you’ll also be smart enough to set up ad blocking, so the point is kinda moot anyway. Plus you’ll be a lot less likely to have your traffic logged opposed to a service vpn.

          • Synnr
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s true. I’d only use a VPN service that’s been audited (either by a security company or, preferably, law enforcement) not to keep logs. There are only a small handful of those however. It really all depends on your needs. There are far more VPN services that do log and sell the data, and/or turn your host device into a proxy for other users/services.