Adding to the mountain of evidence that Israel is engaged in a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip, Al Jazeera on Thursday aired footage of what the news outlet reported was an Israeli drone targeting four Palestinians in Khan Younis last month.

Those killed by the unmanned aerial vehicle in the rubble of the southern Gaza city appear to be unarmed teenagers or young men. According to a translation of the coverage, they were not identified in the reporting.

Tariq Kenney-Shawa, Al-Shabaka’s U.S. policy fellow, said: “This is among the worst footage I’ve seen. Not only were these boys clearly unarmed and present no threat whatsoever, but they were struck multiple times even after stumbling/crawling away. There is no way they could have been considered combatants. This is unreal.”

  • locke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    What’s the context? Why were they targetted?

      • locke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Ok, so you believe they were just random targets and nothing significant happened before this footage to make them become targets?

        Have they been identified?

          • locke
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s true. On the other hand, a lot of propaganda is constructed at the limit of what’s believable.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          They don’t bother to identify them, if they are male between the ages of 16 and 50 they label them a potential combatant. They have been bombing civilians indiscriminately for years, but they have upped the intensity to levels unseen in years.

          • Scrof
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Source: your asshole, I presume.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              It’s been a common practice for militaries all over, it’s not a secret, you can read about it elsewhere if you like. You are right though, my source is my personal knowledge of the subject.

      • ZeroTHM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not trying to be dense here, but is there a better way to conquer and take land? If taking the land is the strategic objective, how else should they proceed other than to clear it off its current populace?

      • locke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        8 months ago

        If that’s their goal, aren’t they progressing rather slowly? Gaza’s population is growing, not diminishing.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Then they are doing a shit job, considering almost 2 million of them remains. Either that or that’s not the goal.

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          8 months ago

          Eradicating 1.5%, more than 3% injured of the population of Gaza, destroying more than 35% of the civilian buildings in Gaza, man-made starvation. And now a planned assault on Rafah, where a big chunk of the population is living in nightmarish conditions. Is this what you call little?

          And believe me the actual number of the casualties is much bigger, considering that there isn’t an independent verification of the direct and indirect casualties. I am sure far rights in Israel are elated.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Genocide is not the goal, but we have been able to accurately predict Israel’s next action every step of the way by simply looking at the script for what a genocidal regime would do. But genocide is not Israel’s goal. It just looks that way. Maybe a weird coincidence.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            8 months ago

            Why should I believe you or anyone, and not people who are on the ground there. We hear aid is provided, we hear aid is taken away from civilians by Hamas beating people, we hear people selling aid packages to others civilians. We hear all sorts of things. But all you people do is ignore whatever narrative you don’t like and focus on one thing. By that measure you can say USA is killing innocent civilians when they dropped that aid package which crushed some of them.

            • theparadox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              We hear aid is provided, we hear aid is taken away from civilians by Hamas beating people, we hear people selling aid packages to others civilians. We hear all sorts of things.

              Which of these potentially terrible things negates what has been done to the people of Gaza? The destruction of their infrastructure - housing, universities, hospitals. The killing of civilians. The living conditions. The starvation.

              So there is some, but not nearly enough aid. So some bad actors are taking advantage of the unimaginably fucked up situation there. How does that change the fact that Israel is at best using collective punishment (a war crime) and at worst committing genocide?

            • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              You don’t have to believe me, but I’m happy to show my work:

              The state of Israel has always rejected the one-state solution and the right-of-return. (It makes political sense, as the Jews would be outnumbered in their own state in a few decades.) It has also rejected or sabotaged a two-state solution by expanding settlements, a process which has ramped up in recent months, so there’s nowhere for a second state to exist. Thus, the people of Palestine cannot live in Israel, and they cannot live in Palestine. No other nations would take that many refugees, so they also cannot leave. The, uhh, remaining solution is to kill them, and the IDF feels no compunction about doing exactly that. For decades, genocide hasn’t been the avowed goal of the state of Israel, just the inescapable conclusion of a cruel logic.

              That brings us up to last October. So what would a genocidal regime do in Israel’s place, if it wanted to exterminate a group of people with enough plausible deniability to avoid triggering intervention by the rest of the world? Cut off incoming food, water, and energy? Check, Israel has done that. Contaminate the groundwater? Check. Destroy the energy, sanitary, and transportation infrastructure? Check. Render civilian homes destroyed or unlivable, and destroy businesses? Check. Destroy the health care system? Check. Drive the population toward the border with progressive waves of attacks? Gaza City -> Khan Younis -> Rafah, check.

              And all of this, after several Israeli government officials stated explicitly that the goal is, at least, ethnic cleansing.

        • dbilitated@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hitler didn’t eradicate the Jewish people. Are you saying that means he wasn’t actually trying?

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nope. Am saying that your comment is wrong. If Israel was trying to do systematic destruction number of deaths would be far higher in such densely populated area. And it’s not.

            • nomous@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh well it’s ok then I guess, they haven’t built gas chambers so it’s not efficient. Two missiles for 4 people really isn’t cost-effective, I see what you mean.

              In your opinion, how efficient does it have to be before they’re trying to “systematically destroy” Palestine?

              • mwguy@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Gaza isn’t large. You could legitimately destroy 90% of standing structures with 10-20k tomahawk-esque missiles. You could like do the same thing with 5-10x the number of artillery shells.

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      They cannot say because they were a threat. Unless they had intel on who these men were? But by the looks of it I can’t imagine any person who is a militant would be walking like these men.