North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, has called for a change to the constitution to identify South Korea as the “number one hostile state”, ending the regime’s commitment to unifying the Korean peninsula.

In a speech to the supreme people’s assembly – North Korea’s rubber-stamp parliament – Kim said he no longer believed unification was possible and accused the South of attempting to foment regime change and promote unification by stealth.

In another sign of quickly deteriorating ties between the two Koreas, which ended their 1950-53 war with a truce but not a peace treaty – Kim said: “We don’t want war, but we have no intention of avoiding it.”

  • Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Couldn’t they just accept the current two-state solution and stop grousing about it?

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was reading a book about the history of the Three Tigers of Asia (Japan, China, Korea), and the author shared popularity posts about how SK doesn’t even want unification anymore. It’s been too long and the whole “splitting families” concept is no longer applicable.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unification would be an economic disaster for South Korea. This is far worse than east and west Germany, North Koreans would need absurd levels of aid. Food, infrastructure, and education have been lacking for decades, it would take generations to repair and integrate the north into modern society.

        • Sibbo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is south Korea a democracy? East Germany has never completely recovered, and is now one of the neo-nazi hotspots in Germany. I wonder what would happen if all the north Koreans would suddenly be allowed to vote in whole Korea. Would they tear all the progress down that the south has made so far?

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, it’s a democracy, although that’s only been true for a relatively short period of time.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          North Koreans would need absurd levels of aid. Food, infrastructure, and education have been lacking for decades,

          FTFY. The need you describe already exists, whether it is filled today, or 50 years from now.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            While true. The aid they would need for integration is far more overarching than just to continue to exist.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have to read between the lines a bit, but that’s actually what Kim is doing here.

      Look at it from the NK perspective. For 70 years, they’ve ostensibly wanted to “reunify” with the south, under the Kim regime. They’ve wanted to throw out foreign influence, eliminate the ROK government, and unite Korea under the DPRK flag.

      In saying that reunification is impossible, Kim is effectively recognizing the south as a separate state.