The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The case concerns the drug mifepristone that — when coupled with another drug — is one of the most common abortion methods in the United States.

The decision means the conservative-leaning court will again wade into the abortion debate after overturning Roe v. Wade last year, altering the landscape of abortion rights nationwide and triggering more than half the states to outlaw or severely restrict the procedure.

  • @YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    886 months ago

    To which it isn’t authorized to rule because that falls to the FDA. They are religious zealots and not qualified to rule on medicine.

    • @Ranvier
      link
      53
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If this is actually successful, expect republicans to begin going after more fda approvals in the courts for things like hiv medications or vaccines. Anything that appeals to their religious zealot base, doesn’t matter how many people they harm.

      Edit: Didn’t think of this originally, and not strictly related to abortion access debate, but the ruling as it stands could allow for pharmaceutical companies to sue each other and try to overturn the approvals of competitors’ drugs. It’s just such an unfathomably bad ruling on soooooo many levels.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 months ago

      Yeah, people don’t really understand the precedent that would be set here.

      Chevron deference is extremely important, and the GOP is openly working to “dismantle the administrative state,” to use their own words.