Stamets@startrek.website to tumblr@lemmy.world · 8 months agoTrue to formstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1841arrow-down129
arrow-up1812arrow-down1imageTrue to formstartrek.websiteStamets@startrek.website to tumblr@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squareJake FarmlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down6·8 months agoNo you spell them the french way and to claim the french are right about anything is a crime against humanity.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 months agoExcept for the metre-system, which is objective more correct
minus-squareJake FarmlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·8 months agoIts more base 10. Arguably, the babylonian base 60 system would be more useful for measurement.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoUsing the same base for regular numbers and for measurements is the most useful, no? We happen to use base 10. That’s going to be hard to change, but sure, it would have been better to choose a more divisable number, maybe 12.
No you spell them the french way and to claim the french are right about anything is a crime against humanity.
Except for the metre-system, which is objective more correct
Its more base 10. Arguably, the babylonian base 60 system would be more useful for measurement.
Using the same base for regular numbers and for measurements is the most useful, no? We happen to use base 10. That’s going to be hard to change, but sure, it would have been better to choose a more divisable number, maybe 12.
Zedbra anyone?