return2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Russia says it rehearsed delivering a massive retaliatory nuclear strikewww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1107arrow-down111
arrow-up196arrow-down1external-linkRussia says it rehearsed delivering a massive retaliatory nuclear strikewww.reuters.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square20fedilink
minus-squarefosforuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·edit-21 年前Well, Russia is a dead empire, a failed state anyway. There would be very little benefit for the US in nuking them at this point. The real deterrence for USA is probably China – if not already, then at least very soon.
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前As long as they maintain thousands of mated warheads and the related delivery systems, deterrence is relevant. The fact that they are fucking themselves up in other ways makes it more relevant, not less.
minus-squarePons_Aelius@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 年前There is no benefit for anyone nuking anyone. Nukes are a negative sum game. Use them and everybody loses.
minus-squareCycloprolene@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 年前 failed state anyway Sir, i don’t think you understand what a failed state is.
Well, Russia is a dead empire, a failed state anyway. There would be very little benefit for the US in nuking them at this point.
The real deterrence for USA is probably China – if not already, then at least very soon.
As long as they maintain thousands of mated warheads and the related delivery systems, deterrence is relevant.
The fact that they are fucking themselves up in other ways makes it more relevant, not less.
There is no benefit for anyone nuking anyone. Nukes are a negative sum game. Use them and everybody loses.
Sir, i don’t think you understand what a failed state is.
Wait, what year is this? WHAT YEAR