• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Since we are designing the consensus algorithm we could remove data that is expired with some quorum vote, or indication from a key holder.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 months ago

      or you could just not do that, and keep control of your own data. Why the hell would I want you to have a vote on whether I can delete my private data, which for some unfathomable reason, someone decided everyone should have a copy of?

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In practice, data owners don’t have control of their data, sysadmins do. This gets complicated in multi-orgnizational data setups.

          • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            data owner was the key one here. If I run a storage service for example, I have control of the data, but you would see it as a breech of trust if I deleted your data, or gave access to someone else without your permission, because you in the scenario are the data owner.