• WintLizard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Is this article written by AI? It has all sorts of strange errors and repeated words. Like the sentence at the end of this paragraph. I know it is popular to call out everything as AI right now but this article is suspicous.

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is a wierd amount of generative-learning articles on game/tech Lemmy. I keep seeing these articles from publications that I’ve never heard of and I get excited because “Oo new people in the space” then halfway through the article I feel duped.

    • notleigh@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Came in to criticise the writing too. Got AI or at least bad translation vibes. Really hard to follow.

    • lonke@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      AI has gotten to the point where it probably wouldn’t make these mistakes.

          • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Never ask it for advice period. It is always confident because that’s the most believable way to present information on the internet. It is usually wrong because it is not actually intelligent.

            • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s not “great”, but it’s slightly helpful sometimes.

              • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                You know its weird, here people are downvoting me for agreeing its great. On another post I’m being downvoted for saying its okay. Y’all just don’t know and thats okay. If you know what you need and you are just unfamiliar with a library, ChatGPT can explain it fine if your prompt is concise.

                If you have no idea what you are doing and know nothing about programming, its not going to help you. I am currently using it to assist with small tasks using Excel.Interop and it basically spat out a working program for me to tweak. Don’t really know what to tell you about that but I can post it to GitHub I guess.

                Its fine with programming so long as you know to take it with a grain of salt and give it detailed prompts. Like for instance, if you don’t specify it usually defaults to Row 1 when dealing with ranges, thats fine, because I know what row I need.

                • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I heard somebody say that it’s like a talented intern. Can produce good results, but you have to verify them yourself first before you use them.

                  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I mean you have to verify it as much as any answer on Stack Overflow. Lets not act like dudes haven’t been ripping code from there and just flying with it.