• filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not to mention that they are extremely wasteful and not good for the environment and our roads. If a small car and SUV went into a head collision the chance of survival of the passengers in the smaller car are much lower.

    • bug@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bigger car = safer is exactly the kind of backwards thinking which causes so many people to unnecessarily buy big cars. The entire concept of Chelsea Tractors comes from middle-class parents thinking they need to do the school run in a tank so little Tarquin and Lilliput will be safe. We have Euro NCAP safety ratings for cars, judge the safety based on the actual tests!

    • Thorny_Thicket
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s one of the reasons I prefer being in the big truck

      • omgarm@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is why I drive a tank. Fuck other people, only I matter.

        Once the shells come in I am firing at construction sites to keep housing prices high.

        • Thorny_Thicket
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not the reason why I bought a truck. Just one of its benefits.

          It’s funny how you come up with this imaginaty caricature of me in your head and then get angry at it for absolutely no reason.

      • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is the same logic Americans use with gun ownership and look how well that’s working out.

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hey, if I could own a welrod or even a goddamned slingshot without breaking the law here, I would.

            • Final Remix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Because maybe I want to relive my glory days as a youth with a toy projectile-thing and not go deaf because our laws require the gun be fucking loud as shit and big over here in murica. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

              • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Ohh. You’re complaining you can’t own a less lethal weapon, I interpreted it as you couldn’t own a lethal weapon at all where you lived. I don’t understand why you’d want a lethal weapon at all, that’s insane to me.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Uh… The best case scenario is two smaller cars. Riding a bigger car to protect yourself is not only extremely selfish, but entirely counterproductive as you encourage other people to do the same. This is very much a tragedy of the commons situation.

        • ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          10 months ago

          Indeed. What happened with cars in the US is an “arms race” on the road. Everyone wants to be in the bigger car so they just get bigger and bigger and reach a point where that e=mc² equation is pegged.

          max selfishness → max energy

          As expected, right-wing U.S. republicans disproportionately drive big cars. While liberals tend to favor small cars or bicycles.

          • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The EPA essentially banned station wagons and people realized you can have spacious, often luxurious, vehicles for their children and whatever shit they’re carrying. I prefer mid-sized sedans, but I only have dogs.

            • Jaccident@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Wait, they banned estate cars? I’ve rented them at various points over the last ten years in the US, what exactly was banned about them?

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not the one with significantly higher rollover fatalities, that’s for sure.

        Just admit you’re scared to drive and stop driving.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        And this is why i avoid roads whenever possible, god bless my city for having so many bike/pedestrian underpasses so we don’t have to even come close to the death boxes most of the time.

      • doggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thanks for demonstration how being a parent can actually make you a worse person. Your children, or OPs for that matter, deserve to be safe and secure only as much as anyone else’s, despite what your hormones may have convinced you.