As speculation mounts that Kim Jong-un and Trump could meet this month, analysts say Pyongyang will continue to see nuclear weapons as a matter of survival

North Korea’s launch last week of a missile from a naval destroyer elicited an uncharacteristically prosaic analysis from the country’s leader, Kim Jong-un. The launch was proof, he said, that arming ships with nuclear weapons was “making satisfactory progress”.

But the test, and Kim’s mildly upbeat appraisal, were designed to reverberate well beyond the deck of the 5,000-tonne destroyer-class vessel the Choe Hyon – the biggest warship in the North Korean fleet.

His pointed reference to nuclear weapons was made as the US and Israel continued their air bombardment of Iran – a regime Donald Trump had warned, without offering evidence, was only weeks away from having a nuclear weapon.

  • Jännät
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wonder how long it will take the EU to understand this

    • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ukraine found that out in 2022.

      France knows, Poland knows and will probably be the first new nuclear power in the EU.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          How on earth would a nuclear arsenal have benefited the Maiden Revolutionaries?

          If anything, a nuclear armed Ukraine would have been invaded by Russia that much sooner.

          • Jännät
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            If anything, a nuclear armed Ukraine would have been invaded by Russia that much sooner.

            That’s generally not how nuclear deterrence works.

            Also, 2014 was when Russia invaded Crimea

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              The nukes aren’t a deterrent if they’re manned by the colonizing entity.

              And Russia invaded Crimea in response to the Maiden Revolution, which ousted a friendly government that was giving Russia easy access to the Crimean ports. Crimea hosts the Russian Black Sea Fleet.

              Imagine the US response if The Philippines or Japan installed a pro-China government.

              • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Why did Russia not invade Poland then?

                They also switched to a pro-west government and resulted in loss of naval facilities. They were also part of the Russian empire and the USSR.

                Same thing happened to China, with multiple pro-west governments in their neigbours.

                Also, we do know what happens in the case of the US. It happened with Cuba.

                Powerful empires always seek to puppet their neigbours. There are only 2 things that effectively prevent that. Mutual Economic entanglement of open democracies and the threat of nuclear weapons.

      • Jännät
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh damn, “fake” cyrillic that actually uses the letters right 😀 well, except for Щ, heh. I might have gone for a more phonetic transliteration myself:

        Антил уй ол спик ращан