Context: The French sure a contentious people.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Ah, I see. We’re playing that game. I’ll play and give you a little tu quoque: your second comment shows that your original comment is simultaneously non sequitur and ad hominem against the OP.

      Got any other random fallacies you want to show you’ve read about, oh enlightened one?

      Surely no true debater on the internet would let this one slide.

      • counterfactualBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Another comment, another strawman. Nice non sequitur to the lack of relevance of your original comment. Not like you’d actually address that issue, would you?

        Or the fact that you accuse me of bigotry under a literal post hating on an entire nationality, which you’re defending, as a bigot?

        No no no. Can’t have logic here.

        Keep throwing fallacy names to see what sticks, it’s what pseudo-intellectuals love to do when they’re full of shit.

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Nah, I’m good. I hope you have a good one, dude. I’m content being able to add “discriminates by Top-Level Domain” to my list of user tags. That’s a keeper.

          • counterfactualBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Love that self-delusion. Keep hating on the French while simultaneously painting yourself as a white knight when someone points out the hypocrisy of hating on a nationality whilst the OP’s is so utterly fucked.

            Birds of a feather, you and OP.