• hschen
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not the guy you replied to but i put Mint on my uncles pc, tried to install some software and it just gave me some errors, tried fixing it for about 40 mins and gave up and just put windows on it. I had an Kubuntu install that just randomly killed itself after a few months as well. It worked fine for a while, then i restarted one day and wouldn’t boot giving some drive error, and i ended up moving to arch after that. Arch has been working very well for me and it has had issues but i could always solve them quite easily.

    At the end of the day all linux distros are essentially running the same software, the only difference is the version of software you’re running, some update faster some slower.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But did you try putting Arch on your uncles PC? Seems like you’d have run into more of the same.

      I’ve been an Arch user on my main machines for years, which is exactly why I’m hesitant to buy that it’s “simpler” and less prone to issues than a distro like Mint.

      • hschen
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im sure that arch would probably cause more issues than mint in the long run, i was just saying Mint or any other beginner distros are not exactly 100% issue free as some would claim them to be

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s just Linux in general at that point though – and really wasn’t what I was responding to.