gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 8 hours agoHe was convicted based on allegedly fabricated bite mark analysis. Louisiana wants to execute him anywayveritenews.orgexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up199arrow-down1external-linkHe was convicted based on allegedly fabricated bite mark analysis. Louisiana wants to execute him anywayveritenews.orggAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 8 hours agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250313110829/https://veritenews.org/2025/03/11/louisiana-jimmie-duncan-bite-mark-analysis-death-row-junk-science/
minus-squareCrewmanlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·7 hours agoAs a reminder, bitemark forensics is found to not be valid, but law enforcement uses it to convict anyway. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2022/10/forensic-bitemark-analysis-not-supported-sufficient-data-nist-draft-review
minus-squareSteve@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-26 hours agoAs far as I know virtually all forensics is invalid. I believe its just DNA analysis, that’s got actual science behind it. https://www.science.org/content/article/reversing-legacy-junk-science-courtroom
As a reminder, bitemark forensics is found to not be valid, but law enforcement uses it to convict anyway.
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2022/10/forensic-bitemark-analysis-not-supported-sufficient-data-nist-draft-review
As far as I know virtually all forensics is invalid. I believe its just DNA analysis, that’s got actual science behind it.
https://www.science.org/content/article/reversing-legacy-junk-science-courtroom