I wanted to get printer photo paper for my printer, a Canon. I went to Walmart, They had nothing. Went to Target, they had one pack of photo paper and it was crazy expensive, so I went to micro center. That one was just as expensive. So finally I went back to Amazon, which I was trying to avoid, and saw the price 25 to 40% lower than anywhere I had been. Literally everything that I was looking for, I could find within seconds. Not even Best buy has even close to the amount of inventory or variety, even when you’re shopping online…

Therefore, I think Amazon has a literal monopoly in the tech industry right now, you’re literally forced to buy from them, because unless you have the money and financial fortitude to protest with your wallet, you’re going to be buying from them. There’s no other choice. They have so aggressively and dominantly taken over the supply chain market that no other tech company can currently compete with them in any aspect at all. You will be paying 40 to 50% more on everything by cutting out Amazon, and no one has the money for that anymore unless you’re upper middle class or above

  • crashfrogEnglish
    165·
    2 months ago

    You’re listing all of the reasons it’s not a monopoly - you can go almost anywhere else and buy the same good.

    Therefore, I think Amazon has a literal monopoly in the tech industry right now, you’re literally forced to buy from them

    You literally weren’t and literally aren’t, so they’re literally not.

    They have so aggressively and dominantly taken over the supply chain market that no other tech company can currently compete with them in any aspect at all.

    If nobody was in competition with them, they’d be raising their prices.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.networkEnglish
        5·
        2 months ago

        This article literally proves their point. When Amazon doesn’t need to compete (because other sites are indexing off their prices) they raise their prices. When they do need to compete (like in the examples OP mentioned) they keep their prices low.

      • crashfrogEnglish
        73·
        2 months ago

        “Essentially” is the load-bearing weasel word here that allows this story to blame Amazon for their competitors choosing to offer the same goods at higher prices.

        • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.eeEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          “Competitors choosing” is usually considered to be price fixing, which is anti-competitive and/or monopolistic. Amazon et al aren’t the only US companies guilty of this or other anti-competitive behaviors, even if they’re a notable example.

          • crashfrogEnglish
            1·
            2 months ago

            “Competitors choosing” is usually considered to be price fixing

            No? It isn’t?

            Where do you think prices come from?

            Amazon et al aren’t the only US companies guilty of this or other anti-competitive behaviors

            How is this anti-competitive?

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              32·
              2 months ago

              At least we can all agree that carpos fix prices in the regular course of business once oligopoly is established.

              • crashfrogEnglish
                11·
                2 months ago

                Price fixing is rare because you gain so much by defecting from the cartel.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  22·
                  2 months ago

                  Well recent bouts of inflation say otherwise but sure you can keep spouting some generic econ 101 slop 🤡

                  • crashfrogEnglish
                    11·
                    2 months ago

                    Well recent bouts of inflation say otherwise

                    They don’t, in fact.