I hope any statistics gathered from this data considers the 87 euro credit.

The actual panels are no longer the most expensive part of an install.

Yeah but they calculate the odds before giving you a policy. And then charge you in a way that they’ll make money.

People talk about tanks and planes, but the shear number of trucks and jeeps the U.S. produced is astounding

And then the Chinese container ship shows up with more VLS cells than the Arleigh Burke has. Even scarier of you consider how many Chinese flagged container ships there are.

I didn’t say it’s not a thing. I’m saying what would be the point of using it for fraud? You don’t make money from a failed launch.

Why would anyone take that bet?

And how does it work?

What would they gain from that? Insurance won’t cover lost income from a dysfunctional satellite. Also pretty sure if you could get insurance it’d be extremely expensive for a launch on an unproven rocket.

You can use your private army to gain currency and other assets by stealing them from other entities. Governments typically don’t like this but if you’re a big enough force they will negotiate.

They could use those disguised drone containers but just on random container ships. Now Russia has to investigate every container ship.

Doesn’t she have an arm based off of Deus Ex?

If you could predict everything perfectly then that’s fine. What if instead of a normal delivery, you needed a week in the NICU? Then that $20k quickly becomes $100k.

Bulgarians always have a soft spot for Russia for helping them gain independence from the Ottomans.

It’s really hard to determine when the right time to transition is. It’ll be costly to build a factory producing obsolete battery tech. Both Honda and Toyota are sitting on some large cash reserves. They see the writing on the wall it’s just tricky to know when to pull the trigger.

Compared with ME though? I remember the first couple times I used ME it crashed. XP was at least always based on the NT Kernel and therefore had some basic stability.

Discovering your colorblind was a common enough occurrence in our electronics lab (you need to look at colored lines to determine a resistor’s resistance) that they had policies for it.

What’s happened is that there have been tons of conspiracy theorist claims against water fluoridation. These claims are not based on any scientific evidence.

However, valid criticism has also been suppressed and in the process fewer studies have been conducted. The topic has been highly politicized, especially recently.

why can’t we have both?

Because drinking water is a basic need and should not be medicated when it’s not even a great way to apply the medicine.

Note that while the risk of issues from proper dosing is low. Improper dosing can and does occur. Sandy City, Hooper Bay, Richmond to list a few. When you improperly dose community water you’re affecting everyone using the water.

If toothpaste or mouthwash was improperly dosed, it would be mostly spit out and the risk is minimized while also maximizing exposure to the enamel.

much of Western Europe, etc.) will also be more likely to adopt the fluoridation of water.

Citation needed.

Of course, fluoride toothpastes are great, but it’s not the best solution for everywhere.

Why not? Or more specifically, why is this insufficient in the US? Are there studies comparing the efficacies?