A standoff between the site and some of its most devoted users exposes an existential dilemma.

  • div@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “These people who are mad, they’re mad because they used to get something for free, and now it’s going to be not free. And that free comes at the expense of our other users and our business. That’s what this is about. It can’t be free.”

    Funny, seems like he has been getting all of it from content to moderation for free, and now he is the one angry it isn’t free any more…huh.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the ownership class always deserves to get things from regular people for free. It’s only those of us who make our living from our physical or mental labour, rather than owning property, that don’t deserve free shit.

      That’s just the hierarchy in action, doncha know.

    • Briongloid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I had thought those where your words at first, you can quote like this;

      These people who are mad, they’re mad because they used to get something for free, and now it’s going to be not free. And that free comes at the expense of our other users and our business. That’s what this is about. It can’t be free.

      I’m struggling to show you what symbol it is without it turning into a quote, so here’s a picture of the greater than symbol;

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To display formatting characters without having them actually affect formatting, put a backslash in front of them. Like this:

        \>

        That produces this:

        >

      • div@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, nice! So I set the quote in between the greater then and less then symbols and it will show the quote? That is pretty cool. Thank you.

        • jennraeross@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not quite I think. I believe this uses markdown, which just uses the > at the beginning of a line

          > This is a quote

          should become

          This is a quote

          And if you need more lines, you just keep symboling

          > 1
          > 2
          > 3

          1
          2
          3

          • rideranton@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            And I believe you can do a multi line quote with 3:

            >>> hello darkness my old friend
            I’ve come to speak with you again
            More
            Lines

            hello darkness my old friend
            I’ve come to speak with you again
            More
            Lines

            Unless I’m wrong and this isn’t actually working

            Hmm well that looks like it worked too well

            > test
            With
            Several
            Lines

            test
            With
            Several
            Lines

            • cwagner@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah, multi-line is just

              > line 1
              line 2
              line 3
              
              

              line 1
              line 2
              line 3

              You only need multiple > if you want paragraphs:

              > paragraph 1
              
              > paragraph 2
              
              

              paragraph 1

              paragraph 2

    • LiveLaughLoveRevenge@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they had charged API fees such that 3rd party apps would have had to charge a monthly fee to users…I would have probably just paid. And I know I’m not the only one.

      But they priced it intentionally to kill 3rd party apps, because they wanted to channel access through their garbage app with its “promoted” ads all over the place.

      It’s not about “free vs. not free” it’s about intentionally killing off the applications that made reddit likeable as a platform.

      • Flyingtiger188@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, if two months ago they said reddit premium members won’t experience any changes, and started pushing ads to 3rd party clients and restricted NSFW posts on 3rd party clients without premium I bet there would have be considerably less push back. I know I probably would have ponied up to $60/year,but instead I have abandoned the site without any intention to return.

  • brownpaperbag@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mr. Huffman is stretching in a variety of directions here. Reddit is not a feudal government, or a city in any sense; neither is it ultimately “democratic,” as he frequently suggests. It’s an advertising and subscription-supported web service that also depends on free content and unpaid labor from its users. It is, substantially, in the same business as Meta, YouTube, Twitter, and TikTok — giving people something to use mostly for free in exchange for their monetizable time and attention.

    I really appreciated this callout in the article.

  • IntlLawGnome@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The money quote IMO is at the end:

    Reddit, like any commercial platform, is only a community until its owners need it to be something else.

    That’s a good reason to be mindful of what we’re building here on Kbin, Lemmy, and other federated networks. We’re not just trying to build a Reddit methadone, to help us down from our high after quitting cold-turkey. We are, I hope, aiming to build (or rebuild) a community – one not dependent on the monetizing whims of a private owner.

    The author is right: Spez lost site of the community aspect. Here’s an opportunity to show them that the idea still means something to a lot of us.

    • flatbield@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One thing that the Reddit guy says that is true, it takes money to run sites. People joining the Fediverse need to realize this and should consider contributing money to their instance if they can.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s honestly one thing that I think will be a problem for many Fediverse services and instances. People nowadays are extremely loath to pay for any sort of online content or service. That’s why ads proliferated; nobody wants to pay for eg. news, video streaming or a social network site, and the people producing the content and services need to eat too.

        Many have been so conditioned into getting everything for free that they get outright angry when someone suggests that maybe news and social networks are so shit nowadays is exactly because they have to bait people into clicking on stuff so they’ll see more ads, and that maybe they should be paying for the content they consume instead of assuming they’re entitled to it by virtue of being online

  • Singletona@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I come from the era of the BBS. The PHP Forum. SlashDot, and Digg. I come from online games ranging from EverQuest, to Multiverse Crisis MUSH, to Moments in Tyme, to Warframe, and More. I have walked messenger clients from the times of AiM, IRC and Yahoo, to Skype, Steam, and Discord.

    In my thirty years of being online, this is not the first petty tyrant claiming that upset users are the problem rather than taking a long hard look in the mirror. This will not be the last.

    The best we can do is grab popcorn and watch as his platform dies. He won’t admit to making any mistakes. Especially with money involved because he’s under the deluded belief that showing any weakness invites a price drop from investors. Yet this behavior? It REEKS of weakness and insecurity.

    Migrate and Move On. the rest is just playing u/spez’s game.

  • Plain@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    One thing that spez notes is that the communities are supposed to be democratic and he’s pushing towards having moderators and admins of the subreddits being left to a vote… While at the same time increasing the amount of draconian measures by implementing his own moderators of the communities.

    I feel like the ability to vote on mods and admins of communities should’ve been implemented ages ago on Reddit to decentralize the power trip, but now with spez doing businessman things instead of harboring a passion for people/ease of use/whatever Reddit’s initial purpose was, this change has come far too late.

    He seems to misunderstand that the people who use and contribute to Reddit use it like other social media platforms, but it’s simply not the case. People use Reddit to stay on topic about their hobbies and passions, and ease of use is a huge part of that. Reddit has been constantly trying to inject more invasive shit into user’s feeds: chats, video ads, obnoxiously colored ads (in the app), those dumbass live streams that they pushed for a hot minute that sucked - when the whole purpose of the site is to get your information about a specific topic or check in on a specific topic.

    Eventually, users do scroll out of the topic and that’s when people’s purpose for staying on reddit changes: they move more towards the entertainment side of things with memes, circlejerking, and simply discussing and hanging out with like-minded individuals (or starting an argument with them over something fringe in regards to the topic at large). And keep in mind this is only 10% of the user base doing this form of contribution - the banter that’s needed to sustain the quality of Reddit. The other 90% of users will realize something is off when things like this go missing, simply because it’s entertaining to not just engage in, but also to read and watch from a lurker standpoint.

    • JunkMilesDavis@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The theme here is that he doesn’t even care enough to create the illusion of caring. The community was never given “democratic” solutions to dysfunctional mod situations until this business reason arose. There’s no community liaison trying to do damage control or make the users feel heard right now – just the CEO himself telling everyone in the plainest terms that nothing they say has any impact because he does not care. People should take all of this at face value.