Nearly a quarter of Americans (23%) agree that “because things have gotten so far off track, true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country,” according to the survey. This is up from 15% in 2021.

In a statement, PRRI researchers say they have asked about this in “eight separate surveys since March 2021.” They said that “this is the first time support for political violence has peaked above 20%” in their survey results.

While Americans across the political spectrum feel democracy is at risk next year, support for political violence runs mostly along party lines.

Currently one-third of Republicans support violence as a means to save the country, compared with 22% of independents and 13% of Democrats, the survey found. More specifically, Republicans who have favorable views of Donald Trump were found to be “nearly three times as likely as Republicans who have unfavorable views of Trump” to support political violence.

Compared to past surveys, researchers also found an uptick in support for conspiracy theories among Americans — specifically QAnon. According to PRRI, there has been a significant increase in “QAnon believers (from 14% to 23%),” as well as a “a decrease in QAnon rejecters,” since 2021. However, Republicans are still twice as likely as Democrats to agree with the core beliefs of the QAnon conspiracy theory.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m one of those who votes for Democrats, but increasingly want to see violence against our politicians, supreme court justices, and others who are not following the will of the people.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately this doesn’t work in practice. Sporadic murders of high profile politicians end up causing a lot of fear and galvanizing public sentiment towards tough-on-crime and other fascist leaders. A wide-scale revolution is almost always co-opted by a strong, militant group that seeks to establish an autocracy afterwards. Often they are bankrolling the revolution. And if they don’t exist at the time of revolution, it is inevitable they pop up to seize control afterwards.

      Also, this is essentially Republicans’ plans: Project 2025

      Project 2025 is a plan to reshape the Executive Branch of the U.S. federal government in the event of a Republican victory in the 2024 United States presidential election.[1][2] Established in 2022, the project seeks to recruit thousands to come to Washington, D.C., to replace existing employees to restructure the Executive Branch of the federal government as to further the agenda and policies of Donald Trump.[3] The plan would perform a quick takeover of the entire U.S. federal government under a maximalist version of the unitary executive theory – a theory proposing the president of the United States have absolute power of the executive branch – upon inauguration.

      I.e. a coup.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn that would be fucked up, could you imagine, the President of the united states, who according to the US constitution is literally the absolute power of the executive branch of government, and actually used that power? Wow. What a crazy world that would be.

      • Narrrz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately this doesn’t work in practice. Sporadic murders of high profile politicians end up causing a lot of fear and galvanizing public sentiment towards tough-on-crime and other fascist leaders. A wide-scale revolution is almost always co-opted by a strong, militant group that seeks to establish an autocracy afterwards. Often they are bankrolling the revolution. And if they don’t exist at the time of revolution, it is inevitable they pop up to seize control afterwards

        so then wth are we supposed to do to fight against the descent into fascism?

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Vote, organize, protest (not entirely legally). If a country falls to fascism or is getting close, there might not be enough the populace can do to stop it or resist. Both examples of Fascist Italy and Germany required outside intervention. We see a LOT of authoritarian countries with little chance at them getting out of it themselves.

          Fighting a fascist country is mostly just playing into their hands. You need an organized resistance ready to setup a government that isn’t just another authoritarian powerbase. Which is a tall order.

          The real way to stop fascism: kill it in the cradle. Don’t let it get to the point where a president or chancellor is executing the legislature and taking supreme executive authority.

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            A good way to stop fascism, is to stop voting for “lesser of two evils.” Since that ensures every election creeps closer to fascism.

              • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                In a first past the post system, there can only be two parties, this is true. However it doesn’t have to be these two Fascist Capitalist parties. Of course voting by itself does almost nothing, but refusing to vote for the two parties of Capital is the absolute least you can do. Who you choose to vote for as long as it is not the two parties of Capital is up to you. If you want to do more, there are plenty of orgs you can get involved in to help build a parallel support structure. Just make sure they aren’t a non-profit, or a foundation led by some professional manager. If they are funded by a local government that’s decent, if they are funded by a co-op that self-funds some other way, that is even better. But all of them require more effort then voting blue.

                • ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you don’t vote then the politicians don’t care. They’ll see your ambivalence as a sign that you think things are fine. Also look more at local elections more than big ones. They help more than you think. Primaries are where you’re actually allow people left of 1980’s Republicans get elected. There have been elections where I’ve been one of the 10 people voting. It really isn’t hard to change elections if you’re doing it right.

                  Also aren’t most of the book burnings happening in multiple states because of just 10 people. Knowing how to vote and apply pressure is better than making some politician 20 minutes late because you pulled out a valve stem core.

            • Neato@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then you split the party vote and fascists win. That’s how party politics work. You need to primary better candidates.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country

    Gee, I wonder where their loyalties lie …

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Currently one-third of Republicans support violence as a means to save the country, compared with 22% of independents and 13% of Democrats, the survey found. More specifically, Republicans who have favorable views of Donald Trump were found to be “nearly three times as likely as Republicans who have unfavorable views of Trump” to support political violence.

    So…

    33% of republicans… and a much larger % of trump supporters?

    And 13% of Dems, it’s assume that 13% mean they won’t resign themselves to peaceful protest if trump successfully steals the election.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      13% recognizing the potential need for self-defense against Trump’s jackbooted thugs.

  • TheJims@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When lying cheating and stealing doesn’t work, it’s a natural progression

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because its easier to believe there’s a vast conspiracy out in the world that’s wrecking your life than it is to admit your choices and personality make people not want to interact with you IRL, so the only real human interaction you get is with other crazy people on line that form an echo chamber and allow you to feel like you have some kind of power or insight into the randomness that is life.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Democrats were more likely to hold this view with 84% support, but supermajorities of Republicans and independent voters said they also agreed with that statement.

    “I think the temperature is high and people feel the sense that the guardrails are down,” Jones explained.

    Currently one-third of Republicans support violence as a means to save the country, compared with 22% of independents and 13% of Democrats, the survey found.

    Compared to past surveys, researchers also found an uptick in support for conspiracy theories among Americans — specifically QAnon.

    The survey found that an overwhelming majority of Americans (94%) agree that “we should teach our children both the good and bad aspects of our history so that they can learn from the past,” compared with just 4% who agree that “we should not teach children history that could make them feel uncomfortable or guilty about what their ancestors did in the past.”

    The survey also found that a majority of Americans trust public school teachers to select appropriate curriculum and they oppose the banning of books that discuss slavery.


    The original article contains 635 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!