“Financial inclusion” seems to be the buzzword that proponents of digital IDs, payments, and data exchange have picked for their PR sloganeering in favor of something that is, objectively, very controversial.
And where better to “test” something of that kind than among those who due to their economic circumstances don’t have much of a say – like a number of African countries.
But don’t expect those behind the effort, juggernauts like Mastercard or the (Bill) Gates Foundation, to ever spell it out in those stark terms. After all, it’s genuine concern for other humans, equity, equality, and kindness that’s been behind the billions, if not trillions of dollars they have amassed thus far, right?
Clearly not.
But what are they up to now?
“Stakeholders” they call themselves – self-appointed though, and their goal – other than, ostensibly, to keep the “global south” in check – is to make sure that digital public infrastructure projects, “including digital IDs,” get as much traction as possible in developing countries (first).
Both Mastercard, and the Gates Foundation, are telling us this is part and parcel of their selfless global fight against poverty and other ills plaguing humankind.
/me opts out
You want to know what’s inclusive? Cash. Cash doesn’t discriminate. Every other form of money is dependent on a form of ID, which is inherently discriminatory. What this is proposing is selling your data for a form of currency, that is essentially controlled by a group of really greedy and powerful individuals.
So, Bill Gates can fuck right off…
Exactly. Funny you should mention it because the article makes no mention of cash. Indeed the digital ID goes hand-in-hand with #Gates, #Mastercard, & #Visa all having a #betterThanCashAlliance membership to wage their #warOnCash.
Their “financial inclusion” agenda is a trojan horse to make their mission appear noble – to appear to care about the poor. It’s really just a means to undermine the unique strength of cash: inclusion.
