• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    PCs are already modular.

    But if Intel actually wants to make it better they’d:

    • stop changing sockets every generation or two (AMD still supports AM4 with CPUs they’re selling right now, and seemingly only change socket when a new RAM standard comes out). To make matters worse, whenever Intel does use the same socket across multiple generations, it’s only generations where there’s a minor performance bump (or a performance regression)

    • Refuse to certify non-standard OEM motherboards

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s kinda crazy that I’m using the same motherboard for my 5800X3D that I originally bought for my 1800X.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reduce e-waste? I might believe that from AMD, but it sounds disingenuous given Intel’s history of making incompatible interfaces for no reason (that 3rd world circuit benders can make interoperate).

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    It might help if some manufacturer didn’t invent a new socket form factor every bloody year.

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    PCs are already modular though, and have been for basically the entire time people have used the term, unless you buy them from a vendor like Dell or HP. This article isn’t about Intel creating some new universal standard, it’s about Intel creating yet another competing standard (that they control) so they can get in on the vendor lock-in party.

  • qyron
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Throw that very innovative concept to laptops and call back.

    Any pc enthusiast already knows a desktop is, by definition, modular. Unless we’re speaking of making components on the motherboards uogradeable and seriously boosting hability for end-users to self repair components, this is not something ground-breaking.

  • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Arent PCs already modular? And if they are talking about board level modularity, like changing mainboard components, cant everyone with a pinecil already do that?

    • Saff@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess sometimes with the big oems they use custom psu/motherboards but yes otherwise they are completely….

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    people are commenting that pcs are already modular but reading it I think its looking to throwback a bit further. Computers used to have a passive backplane design and you would put in a compute card with the processor and a memory card the way you do a graphics card or audio card. Much of that went away because they needed interconnects with larger throughput and isa was just to small. Given where pcie is at this point I can see going back. Its something I sorta wanted in the early aughts back when you had boards with isa, pci, and vesa slots. It was kinda a mess but we still had some old stuff and it was like. Wow that is so much more neat and tidy.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    As everyone in the comments is saying, PCs are obviously modular already, but it’s not exactly something the average person is going to do. Maybe they can make it simpler and more accessible so it’s more like swapping the keyboard.