" … as soon as vehicles come in the right price range next year … people will flock to buy them.”

    • Breve@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup, also American automakers get plenty of subsidies and bailouts from the government too. It was always about not wanting to make electric cars. 🤷

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s what the environment needed. More people buying more cars. I bet the floor mats are 100% recycled.

    • yonder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Electric vehicles are peddled as some sort of cure to climate change when they are only a bit better than gasoline cars since they still need the massive amount of infrastructure needed for cars. I stilk think that people buying an electric car when their gasoline car breaks is reasonable enough if other transport options are unavailible. But our focus should be on making those other options of transport both availible and reasonable rather than focusing on a specific drive train technology.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’ll take our expensive luxury EVs with 2 miles a charge and like them…er I mean buy giant pickup trucks instead that use 20 gallons of gas / mile while the world burns.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Don’t worry; Indonesia has a lot of nickel that has plunged the nickel prices around the world, which will certainly decrease the cost of making batteries since the mines are owned by… China. Ahh fuck.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        the cheapest battery chemistry, used in most affordable EVs, uses no nickel or cobalt. “Race”/premium EVs still want to use that type of battery, though

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    China’s ultra cheap EVs are subcompacts that are extremely well suited to small batteries to keep them cheap, while having good range/mileage. Small batteries can work for EVs if there is good charging infrastructure. Europe, being densely populated, is suited to having good charging infrastructure on heavily used highways, and “drive through small towns” which have cafes and restaurants suited to recharging at EU life pace.

    EU/French car history is ultra well suited to small cars, where cities have narrow streets, and affordability has always been popular.

    EVs with small batteries, even in EU/US, can be built cheaper than ICE vehicles by domestic brands. Battery costs are falling everywhere, but licensing/importing Chinese tech to bringing battery costs down, is path to domestic EV industry success/growth. EU is especially vulnerable to geopolitical oil extortion, from both friends and foes.

  • earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    The only reason they are cheaper is because of the super high import taxes of Chinese EV.

    I hope China starts to build giga factories in Europe, so we get cheap and good products, instead of that French crap.

    • khaleer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah for sure, china and “good products” do not go well together.

      • urandom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Afrikaans
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Surprisingly, the China-made Tesla Model 3s tend to be of exceptional quality, whereas the US-made ones are not

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not true, you get what you pay for. Western companies make purchases from manufacturers and once it sells well they nickel and dime their suppliers. So when they say it must be cheaper, the manufacturer sais yes… and they replace a metal holder with a plastic once painted chrome… to lower the price as requested. This is how it works.

      • earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Someone is stuck in the 90‘

        You know, lots of things have changed since then. Also, please check how many items in your household are made in China. You will be surprised how good their quality is, compared to the things you can buy for no money on AliExpress or Temu.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        You do realize that they only produce cheap shit for mainly americans to buy. They are exceptional craftsmen, but they keep the good stuff.

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          As someone who has lived in China, no that’s not the case. Of course Chinese people can and do make high quality things, but there is a huge amount of incredibly poor quality stuff at all levels. As an example the floor of the flat I lived in fell through into the (thankfully empty) flat below two years after I left it, the building was less than 15 years old.

          Partially its because of the real lack of regulatory oversight in China and partially because of a cultural sense of “ends justify the means” when it comes to business ethics.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nobody should be excited for a race to the bottom, but cars generally have been overpriced and this seems like a pretty normal trend of price correction trying to take shape in this wonky market.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Europe wouldn’t. The US would. I’m one of those US-centric users everyone gripes about, it would seem.

        • Farid@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think the US would either. Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies. Doubt EU is gonna subsidize cars, at least as heavily as China.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies.

            That was the justification, yes.

            • Farid@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Whether you agree or not with their justification (or think that it’s not the real reason), they clearly have no justifications (or reasons) to impose tariffs on unsubsidized (or at least not as heavily subsidized) EU cars.

                • Farid@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The oil lobby wouldn’t be specifically against cars from another region, they are against electric vehicles in general, whether they are produced domestically or otherwise. The primary benefactors from the tariffs are the US electric car manufacturers, who would lose profit over not being able to compete with subsidized cars. They are probably the ones who lobbied for them.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies.

            This is mostly a lie. EU placed smaller/fairer tariffs based on those subsidy allegations, but in US, all politicians are devoted to oil oligarchy profits. 100% EV tariffs and 50% solar tariffs, 25% battery and ebike tariffs are all about protecting oil, instead of small domestic solar industry. Global warming is a lower priority than war, or making sure existing and new oligarchs have plenty of profits to fund politicians with.