- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles
- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles
You must log in or # to comment.
I mean, they might be against it for the wrong reasons, but it would be better if we tried to fix the climate without aerosol…
Agreed geoengineering is bad science/engineering IMO. You can’t know what the long term effects would be until after its been deployed. The safest bet would be to just ditch fossil fuels but that’s not as sexy.
Also, we already have examples of tech bros creating a business where companies pay them to offset their carbon footprint by shooting unknown chemicals of unknown quantities into the upper atmosphere.
We had chemtrails for so long that at.thia point getting ‘fogged’ will change absolutely nothing now that all the frogs are gay.
They’re trying to make this the new recycling aren’t they… Pitching an idea that seemingly would work, and feels like we’re doing something without actually addressing the problem
When the media starts over focusing on something odd, it’s because billionaires have an agenda
