• Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Next summer’s horror blockbuster is the biggest release yet to be shot with iPhones—and not even Apple’s latest model.

    But iPhone 15 is the latest model? The 16 Series is still the future model, until people can actually get them. And they even say that principal filming has wrapped in August further down.

  • classic@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Crap. If I hope this doesn’t mean motion sickness inducing shaky cam filming

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      With the gear on the picture in the article it seems like they stabilized the iPhone like you would any ordinary camera too.

      … but there was also mention of action cameras strapped to farm animals, so I’m a bit torn.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m glad they mentioned the release dates in the article because for a second there I was about to look up when “28 Weeks Later” came out to see if this mad lad waited 28 years to make the next movie. It came out in 2007 so it’s been 17 years. For some reason I felt like it was so much older than I remember, but it would have come out when I was a toddler if they did release it 28 years ago.

    … Anyway. I’m stoked to see the movie.

    • dunz@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The first in the series, 28 Days Later, came out in 2002 actually

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        True. I was comparing it to the second for some reason. But still, only 22 years and I’m just dumb. :)

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is this a big deal? Tons of movies have been shot with consumer camcorders which are probably worse than a modern phone camera.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Maybe? Depends on how it’s used and if it looks good. Maybe they chose it because it looks a bit shit.

      The Creator garnered some attention because it looked great while being shot on a relatively inexpensive camera. I do think people would be really surprised at what you’d get with a gimbal mounted cellphone with a 360° camera in terms of special effects integration, but this might not be their route.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Boyle is probably the biggest name to hop on the digital hype train early on, so this isn’t super shocking.

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Those early digital years were brutal. 28 Days Later looks worse with every passing year, probably never fixable (the cam’s resolution and quality was just too low).

      Edit: Wow, it was shot in SD 480 for some reason (I thought the cam was capable of HD 720). Fantastic article, full of tech details.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      For anyone curious:

      the particular model used to shoot was the iPhone 15 Pro Max. (Evidently, filming took place too early for Boyle and Mantle to get their hands on the new iPhone 16 series.)

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Dude, read the article. Iphone 16 wasn’t even released 28 years ago, let alone the pro.