• schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    Open source people “cheering” for Broadcom and Qualcomm based chips? I’m horribly confused as to when the open source types decided they liked greedy, horrible, shitty companies?

          • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            What I mean is, given the open source nature of RISC V, if someone puts out a chip with a proprietary extension, isn’t it likely that there will be a rip off that does the same but in an alternative manner? Like how there’s tonnes of Raspberry Pi like boards available.

            • taanegl@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              The RISC-V is an extensible ISA, so yes. All those vendor extensions are optional, when fabricating the processor, which can be replaced by other extensions over time.

              Both Intel and AMD have had vendor extensions in the designs that they no longer use, even ones that have been “retracted” (i.e whatever in the heck Intel is doing with their AVX extensions).

              But yeah, currently, there are a lot of proprietary extensions, which could still be declared as open hardware as well. So yeah.