• Vik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wouldn’t it have been better to compare the water consumption of farming beef with annother protein source like beans, lentils etc?

    • moroni@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Comparison generated by AI:

      Food Liters of Water per 1 kg Protein per 1 kg Liters of Water per gram of Protein
      Beef 15,415 liters 200 g 77 liters
      Chicken 4,325 liters 310 g 14 liters
      Pork 5,988 liters 270 g 22 liters
      Lentils ~4,177 liters 250 g 17 liters
      Beans 5,053 liters 230 g 22 liters
      Potatoes ~264 liters 20 g 13 liters
    • jerkface@lemmy.caM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It would be more convincing but it would not be more meaningful. If you only ate potatoes and you got enough calories, you would be getting enough protein. The whole idea of a “protein source” being a nutritionally significant concept is bogus. If anything, you want to moderate your protein.

      • Vik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t know, it seems sort of arbitrary comparing a high protein source with an all rounder, and the water requirements for producing lentils (whilst substantially higher than potatoes) is still significantly lower than for beef. Don’t get me wrong, I love me some taters and lentils.

        As for proteins nutritional significance, wouldn’t depend on your lifestyle and dietary requirements?