• AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lemon laws protect from defects, and require a manufacturer who can’t repair the defect to take back the car for a refund.

      This type of behavior is usually an attempt to claim those don’t apply because it’s user error or damage while operating, rather than a defect. It’s complete BS to make that claim, but I guess if it means some people won’t stand up for their rights, the manufacturer is up the cost

    • CareHare@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Non FreedomBoii here; is that the law that says you just gotta make the best of life with what you’re given?

      • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        @AA5B@lemmy.world said it but replied to me instead of to you.

        A “lemon” law says that if someone sells you a “lemon” (a vehicle that’s prone to failure or needs a lot of repairwork), they have to either repair it or take it back. But it still requires the customer to initiate legal action (or at least, threaten legal action). Once the lawyers get involved, the dealerships or whatever back down… because lemon laws are usually clear and easy to prosecute over.

        But it still requires that initial effort. If these people just… sit back and take the abuse from Tesla, nothing will happen.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They also adore all of the looks they get in their lemon. So even though these trucks are shit automobiles, they delivered on the reason every single one of these buyers’ top priority. They are the center of attention wherever they go.