For anyone wondering if Threads and Facebook at large will be a fine neighbor in the space and compatible with other apps/services in the fediverse: they’re already automatically hiding comments that mention Pixelfed https://mastodon.social/@dansup/112126250737482807

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If there are any instances or comms that don’t let you mention alternatives, then yes definitely shut them down

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        so fediverse instances must adhere to some global moderation, or else? sounds an awful lot like a walled garden.

        you sound exactly like what you hate

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          One of the cool things about the fediverse is that you are free to run your own instance with whatever rules you do or don’t want, and tell the rest of us to fuck right off.

          Some instances will defederate from you depending on what those rules are, like those specific relatives we all avoid if we can at holidays, and ignore the rest of the year. They are also free to do so.

          IOW, folks might tell your instance (or Meta’s) to fuck right off.

          That’s what freedom looks like. It’s not supposed to be just your freedom, it’s supposed to be everyone’s freedom.

          Edit: And by the way, I’m very surprised if a company scrubbing mentions of competitors from its platform isn’t a solid anti-trust violation.

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            exactly! each instance can do its own thing. so its very strange to see people shitting on meta for doing exactly that.

            federate/defederate i dont care, but this hate-boner everyone gets from the idea of meta on the 'verse is childish.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              each instance can do its own thing. so its very strange to see people shitting on meta for doing exactly that.

              You mean scrubbing mentions of a competitor from their platform? That’s not OK, and it’s an indicator of their future behavior that is very consistent with their past behavior.

              this hate-boner everyone gets from the idea of meta on the 'verse is childish.

              You are entitled to your opinion. (And so are the folks you think are being childish.)

    • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nobody is saying to shut down any instance, only that we, and others on the platform who think likewise, would like to not have to see those instances. Nobody is saying to shut down Truth Social or Pawoo or Baraag, for instance, despite having severe disagreements with those instances - we just decided, on our instances, not to federated with them. You aren’t obligated to agree with us - you can make your own instance with your own rules, as others have said, or switch to an instance accommodating to your beliefs. But at the same time, it doesn’t mean the rest of us have to listen. Think of defederation like blocking - I’m sure you have some sort of block list for trolls, spammers and bots. Same thing, but for an instance.