The Hawaii Supreme Court handed down a unanimous opinion on Wednesday declaring that its state constitution grants individuals absolutely no right to keep and bear arms outside the context of military service. Its decision rejected the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment, refusing to interpolate SCOTUS’ shoddy historical analysis into Hawaii law. Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the ruling on this week’s Slate Plus segment of Amicus; their conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s both. Without weapons with which to train, a well-regulated militia made up of ordinary civilians isn’t possible.

    It’s saying, with a weird comma out of place, that civilians can be armed so that a militia is possible.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fun fact, you don’t need guns on you 24/7 for training. You don’t even need to store them at home.