• postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Lol what a pathetic taunt.

      Edit for the ultra daft downvote crew: the fact the US killed civilians is directly relevant to the blub i responded to, the one claiming the US was bettter than Israel because it did not kill civilians.

      For the extra determined ignoramouses ive provided this as an example :

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Your link to the definition of ‘avoid’?

          I avoided nothing. I addressed the issue directly.

          The USA kills civilians.

          Israel does at a much faster rate. A genocidal one in fact.

          But that does not give any creedence to the notion the USA is innocent.

          QED JFC

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Now you’re moving the goalpost. Dude, just admit your wrong. The US goes to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I have actually. I also saw the unedited version WikiLeaks was really hoping nobody would see.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    Because it was a running gun fight. The Army also released it’s After Action report showing there was in fact RPGs there. Now I’m not saying the reporters were bad guys, but they clearly embedded with an anti coalition militia. That carries the same risk of getting killed as embedding with coalition forces.

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Nevwr moved the goal posts. You just need a bit more reading comprehension.

              And no, civilian damage and deaths will not prevent the USA from striking targets.

              Look up Obama’s record of drone striking weddings.

              It is why i left the industry.

              Ive been inside DARPA and the Pentagon discussong collateral damage.

              Avoiding it is not a priority.

              Why?

              1. to be feared by tge enemy

              2. so the enemy cannot use human shields

              But directly targeting non combatants and hiding behind ‘faulty intelligence’ has been a common occurance.

              Remember the car full of water and children the US blew up as they left Afghanistan?

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                You should really read that definition of avoid. Because you keep using it as an absolute term when it very much is not.

                And I don’t care if you were some white coat back in the States. I was on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan. If we weren’t worried about avoiding civilian casualties we wouldn’t have gotten out with so few.