• flying_monkies@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They weren’t banned.

      They required a $200 tax stamp at the time.

      Now, they require a federal form (NFA Form 4), the $200 tax stamp and a metric ass ton of money since the public cannot purchase a full auto weapon manufactured after 1986 (Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986).

      edit: Changed the tax amount, actually looked it up.

        • flying_monkies@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You forgot to also add that regular people cannot do all that because they also need to be a FFL

          No, I didn’t, because, no they don’t.

          If they’re manufacturing automatic weapons or wish to purchase an automatic weapons manufactured after 1986 to law enforcement, THEN you need a class 3 FFL license. If they’re manufacturing, then they also need to file a form 1.

          Private individuals can purchase a machine gun without an FFL, assuming your state law allows it via form 4. An FFL makes the process easier, but it’s not a requirement

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yes. They are what are defined federally as “assault weapons” this entire discussion here is about.

      So this headline and story are literally pointless and designed to instigate arguments.

      I am pro gun and own several, however fuck automatic weapons no one needs those except the military and cops. Also fuck cops.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why do cops need weapons at all? They are the most likely to misuse them and you are more likely to die from a cop then you are to die by an automatic weapon, or an “assault rifle.”