With climate change looming, it seems so completely backwards to go back to using it again.

Is it coal miners pushing to keep their jobs? Fear of nuclear power? Is purely politically motivated, or are there genuinely people who believe coal is clean?


Edit, I will admit I was ignorant to the usage of coal nowadays.

Now I’m more depressed than when I posted this

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because the amount of fuel used in a nuclear reactor is exponentially less than fossil fuels.

    There’s enough nuclear material on this planet to power nuclear reactors for tens of thousands of years.

    Nuclear power is clean, efficient, and lasts for essentially ever

    • Admetus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s close to ‘renewable’ but technically it should be called ‘low carbon fuel’.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are processes on our planet renewing air. I’m not aware of similar processes for fission materials.

          • legion02@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s renewable in the same way that solar is. Eventually the sun will die and solar won’t work just like we’ll eventually run out of fissible material.

        • Admetus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          As with all power plants, wind turbines, solar panels, etc. there are carbon costs associated with the manufacturing, construction and transport. Remember that there’s a lot of steel involved.

    • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s an interesting take. I guess the sun is not renewable either.

      Is any practically infinite (in human scales) source of energy called renewable? I am hearing this for the first time.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t understand this comment.

        How is the sun not renewable?

        Renewable energy means using renewable resources. Meaning things that either replenish themselves within a short enough period or things that produce massive amounts of energy over long periods of time.

        • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because the sun is also a depleting source of energy. I question the definition of renewable that’s all.

          I would have never considered nuclear energy being renewable, but I guess a similar argument could be made.

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            The sun will exist for hundreds of thousands of years after humanity has gone extinct. The sun will exist for millions of years before it burns out. Humanity will thrive diminish and die before the sun dies.

            It is by all intents and purposes an infinite resource for a finite species.

            • floofloof@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The sun will exist for hundreds of thousands of years after humanity has gone extinct. The sun will exist for millions of years before it burns out.

              Your timescales are off. Even if humanity lasts a very long time, which seems unlikely, the sun will last for billions of years after humanity is gone. In one billion years the sun will have become hotter so that life becomes impossible on Earth. There will be four billion years of a lifeless Earth before the sun expands into a red giant and either swallows up or cooks the Earth. One billion years after that the sun will kick off its outer layers into a nebula and become a white dwarf. At that point it’s not reacting any more so it just gradually cools down over billions more years until it’s just a cool lump.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Technically speaking, it does not renew itself. It is being slowly depleted. You are right in saying that we can treat it as a renewable source as far as us and our technologies are concerned.

            • Kalash@feddit.ch
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m quite certain we can manage to stop existing before nuclear fuel runs out as well.

              • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Is lemmy just stupid?

                Like seriously?

                The sun is an infinite resource to humanity. This isn’t a debatable fact. Yet I seem to be receiving downvotes despite this.

                The sun will outlive humanity a million times.

                We can either harness it’s energy and other sources like it or run out of energy.

                It seems people just don’t like the word “renewable”

                That just makes those people stupid.

                • floofloof@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Is lemmy just stupid?

                  Like seriously?

                  Lemmy at this point is the same as Reddit for quality of discussion.

                  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    The sad part is it seems like this has become a recent problem. As in the past few days.

                    I deliberately switched from sh.itjust.works to lemmy.world because I was sick of hexbear users starting fights and just being disingenuous with their arguments.

                    Now it seems that’s normal everywhere…