All your comments give me the Impression I am talking to a brick wall. Maybe it is a ESL thing or perhaps your profound lack of reading comprehension. Any insight?
My insight is that you’re a cunt.
If you want to not talk to a brick wall try engaging properly, defending your position (or changing it) and not resorting to insults. Not on me though, I’m outta here.
https://vger.to/lemmy.world/comment/22581151
This comment gives the impression of trying to justify it.
You absolutely can alter perception with evidence. It depends on your audience. Using statistics in a misleading way has the opposite effect.
You’re trying to justify the perception. If you’re not trying to, you’re doing it by accident, so maybe that’s something you can avoid.
The mind boggles that you understand this but want to encourage people to do the irrational thing instead of put the statistics in context. I get not trying to persuade people the US is safe to travel to (from the pov of gun violence) but why would you try to persuade them that it isn’t???
What proportion of those are people visiting for work or tourism?
It’s ridiculous to downplay in the sense of the domestic response. But in terms of risk in this context, it’s not a factor.
It’s not a “narrative”; it’s their experience. I don’t have the same experience, but do have experience of myself and colleagues using LLM agents effectively and doing more work reviewing their output than writing lines of code. Some colleagues are pretty much AI boosters, but most are very aware of its limitations.
Developing mission-critical systems in scripting languages
This is a wild take. If you’d come up in the 80s you’d be complaining about using C instead of hand-writing assembly.
Writing lines of code was the bottleneck before. Vetting them is the bottleneck now, if LLMs are involved.
Which country(s) are you talking about? In n the case of Iran, the western meddling installed the Shah who was a secular force, overthrown by the extreme Islamists.
Because you’ve been fooled by the focus on those ships.
They’re not problematic because of their greenhouse emissions. Hauling stuff by sea is very efficient - by greenhouse gas emissions it is more efficient than rail freight. They’re problematic because they burn very dirty fuel which releases sulphur dioxide and particulates which are a different kind of pollutant. However, they’re released far from human population centres, and their most serious effects are localised, unlike greenhouse emissions, which are global. The environmental problems of cargo ships are there, but they are not the serious, urgent threat to human life that climate change is.
As such, they are a distraction.
If you’re now outraged about the accusations of paedophilia than a pointless war that has already cost many dead and is causing global economic turmoil, your priorities are fucked. This is the new worst thing he’s done
That’s nothing to do with Carney… What aren’t I getting?
Wait how has Mark Carney bent the knee?
It’s not really a difference in English, either. “Venom” is a specific term, but “poison” is general, so too with poisonous.
I think it’s specific in some scientific areas, but insisting on that is like insisting on calling a tomato a fruit, or a banana a berry.
Oh my god I thought I was the only one banging this drum
I thought the unique thing was that you didn’t know if you’d got the perfect solution until you submitted…
Every doctor and mental health professional will tell you that physical activity is good for your mental health. That’s not the problem.
This is completely wrong.
Now THIS is a shower thought
There were already plenty of reliable compilers at least for the main architectures in use. Replace C with Fortran though if you prefer - complaining about python in mission critical software is a brain-dead take that belongs in the bin of history.