Is being facist towards people born with a low intellectual capacity OK? They cant help it

Buy a mac or support steamOS adoption or just get a linux distro. This will drive the improvement of nontechnical consumer GNU/Linux

You are young and blissfully naive. Sec being included with development is a recent thing

Good, fuck call centers. Make sure the societal benefit is captured via tax

Botw and sequel are critically acclaimed across the board.

The US saying how free it is compares to a small guy telling you how much of an alpha male he is. Unreliable narration

The narcissism on so many levels is such an adorable aspect of this generation

Are you autistic?

I recognise that, I think it’s important to make very clear distinctions with no sweeping statements when prescribing value to demographic groups.

This is a reasonable request

Why is ‘race’ relevant here? What the fuck is wrong with Americans and how did they become so astonishingly self flagellating.

That said… this sounds like one of those fantasy scenarios where “then everyone clapped”.

Just on the insecure posture of this tweet, I’m prepared to bet cold hard cash that he asked her for clarity or something with a informational challenge “but does x not come from y?” Or whatever and she manufactured his reasoning and the rest to feel good. She doesn’t seem to know what et al means either.

This wasn’t him 9 years ago dumbass

Few people in that period had the information you have now. People were presented with this economic miracle in the 50s and there was little to no components other than conformity.

Let’s see if any Lemmy users are able to correctly identify why this is happening. Bonus points for American-Style ignorance

Then my goal has been achieved. Thanks for the discussion.

When a culture has high levels of conscientiousness and low levels of openness, it results in this. It did in the 30s as well.

Because younger people will be the audience for a high school wikipedia article link. While I’m sure it’s reflexive for some to check the basics on Wikipedia, others thankfully may not be in that particular educational stage, as this discussion wouldn’t be valid otherwise.

My comment on it’s relevance stands, I don’t think I veered at all.

I’m depressed to see that you invoked Godwins law with such enthusiasm. Please don’t ever reference nazi apologia to me in the same breath as justification for dehumanising others. It’s in acutely poor taste and education.

There is nothing circular about my logic that I can see, and youve not highlighted any. I’ve accused you of speaking the same rhetoric despite it being addressed which might qualify?

Luxemburg is proven wrong by there never being a revolution, the reformation and lasting are a separate discussion.

Movie studios pay unimaginable money to learn what people want. It is a constant, year round expenditure for them. Their information and data suggests that while a vocal minority may be fed up with remakes, people still fervently buy them, have very short memories and seem to go bananas for any shred of nostalgia bait.

Remakes are as a result an incredibly safe bet, they are less expensive and less risk, which in financial terms is a green light. Until they aren’t either of those things and they carry more risk, they will continue to be pedalled out.

Thank you for linking the Wikipedia article on egalitarianism, I hope someone younger finds it useful.

Egalitarianism is a wonderful thing. But unfortunately, it has nothing to do with what the original post was addressing. Treating everyone right of you as “them” and lumping them all into the same, dehumanised category of being inferior, stupid and wrong is the opposite of egalitarian thought.

I already addressed the status quo/inequality in my original reply. You are currently doing the broken record thing of repeating the same point again as if it needs to be said. Yes, conservativism maintains a lot of bad things! We have already discussed this.

Luxemburg, was proven wrong by history.

I’m not sure you are asking an actual question but an example might be language, or attempting to preserve the existing culture. This is a noble effort, but often falls short in reality because it becomes too inhibiting or unreflective of the state of play for everyone.