Gork to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agoTriangle ruleimagemessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1264arrow-down13
arrow-up1261arrow-down1imageTriangle ruleGork to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agomessage-square23linkfedilink
minus-squareqjkxbmwvz@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months ago That almost makes sense, but pi radians = 180° Right, a triangle “has 180deg,” like I said. in which case π÷n is infinitesimally small. In other words, substituting infinity for n would be incalculable That’s not how limits work. Substitution is not the same as taking the limit. infinite and infinitesimal numbers are impossible to express rationally. That’s not true at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1/2_%2B_1/4_%2B_1/8_%2B_1/16_%2B_⋯ It’s not about colloquialism or language Having one word (or phrase) with two meanings is a property of language.
Right, a triangle “has 180deg,” like I said.
That’s not how limits work. Substitution is not the same as taking the limit.
That’s not true at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1/2_%2B_1/4_%2B_1/8_%2B_1/16_%2B_⋯
Having one word (or phrase) with two meanings is a property of language.