Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoDeliveryslrpnk.netimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1632arrow-down123
arrow-up1609arrow-down1imageDeliveryslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squarecheddar@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up74·18 hours agoIt’s like removing a laugh track from an old sitcom.
minus-squareHugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up15·edit-216 hours agoIt’s better, because here the underlying pacing isn’t left ruined after the removal. Removing the laugh track leaves behind (hilariously) awkward gaps. This is what laugh track removal would look like in this case Actually kinda funny still, lol
minus-squareVindictiveJudge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·11 hours agoAlso, depending on your definition of ‘old,’ that laugh track might be a live studio audience rather than canned laughter.
It’s like removing a laugh track from an old sitcom.
It’s better, because here the underlying pacing isn’t left ruined after the removal.
Removing the laugh track leaves behind (hilariously) awkward gaps.
This is what laugh track removal would look like in this case
Actually kinda funny still, lol
Also, depending on your definition of ‘old,’ that laugh track might be a live studio audience rather than canned laughter.