• Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, because what we really need is to incentivize more usage of fossil fuels.

    • imkali@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      people having a life and being able to afford to change their lifestyle away from fossil fuels is more important at the moment.

      we really need more education surrounding the issues and better alternatives, once everyone realises how much damage cars cause and once they realise/once they have a viable alternative (i.e. trains) then people will start to switch away. in the mean time people still need their cars to get to work, because that is how the US is designed, and expensive fuel will only result in them having less spare change, rather than them actually using their car less.

      sure, if everyone had enough money that they could afford to change up the way they do things or if everyone had a job that they can do from home or if everyone lived within walking distance from their job, then maybe you would have a valid argument. people are much less likely to go on a road trip, for example, if its gonna cost them 3x more than they expect it to cost, but people need to go to work to survive.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ll never argue in favor of fossil fuel, but making transportation prohibitively expensive only hurts the average person.