• Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    219
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    My understanding of how this works is that that left one is real accounts making real comments, at least in the majority.

    Then when the link gets reposted, either by a bot or naturally, potentially depending on the title, the bots scrape the old comments and post them.

    It’s content farming. And Reddit is probably okay with this.

    • moriquende@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      176
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The right one is the “real” accounts. Notice how the left one is newer and all the accounts have names ending with four digits, except where they aren’t copies from the right.

      • Sternout@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, the left one is older and most the names in the right contain four numbers.

        What’s going on here?

        Maybe op updated the picture?

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          I saw this exact same style of bot account years ago on Tumblr. They always follow the same naming scheme: one word or two words combined and then a string of 4 digits. I bet if you go to any of their profiles, you’ll find like 4 comments that are all copied from old threads and a bunch of upvotes on completely random subs, possibly even all of them being on other bot accounts’ posts and comments.

          The real question is whether they’re being used to fake activity on Reddit, sway public opinion by posting this sort of political slant, or will they later be used to advertise scams and this is just to make them seem legitimate.

          • sep@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why not all of the above? If you have a service, you want to sell it to as many customers as possible.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I thought the names followed that format because that’s the format reddit used for suggestions when signing up.

            I think the accounts are kind of “warmed up” this way to make them harder for reddit to identify as bots when they’re used for vote manipulation.

            Like a bot that just voted in /r/politics threads world be easier to identify than one which comments here and there and gets a few upvotes itself.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s account farming. They make fake accounts look legitimate so they can use them to influence opinions on the site.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Definitely depends on where you’re going. Certain Hexbear posts are such obvious bot networks, while some niche communities can remember what they wrote more than two comments ago.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I have a more realistic description of “Dead Internet Theory” that involves no conspiracy theories:

      The Internet is becoming a monoculture, which is killing the vibrant, diverse, resilient, innovative space it used to be. Manifestos about a better way of life, and creative personal websites have been replaced with vapid social status posts in bland bootstrap layouts that double as data collection schemes. Technology that empowers people has been replaced with technology to restrict people. Bots masquerading as people is just the cherry on the sundae, the inevitable outcome of having created such a monoculture, a place where large orchards of content are so easy to pollute. The modern Internet ducking sucks, it has been ruined by people.

    • arymandias@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Reading the Wikipedia it seems quite unlikely, but then again maybe it’s also written by a bot.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        As a human I think the Wikipedia article is correct. I’m not a bot (drinking water right now- bots cannot do this).

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I saw a movie where bots had a kind of food & drink bag inside their belly to correct whatever they put in their mouth so they could emulate biologicals.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This gets posted all the time, and it’s frustrating that it lacks any nuance.

      It’s just a spooky bedtime story… “imagine if everyone you talk to online is just a bot”

      Yes a lot of online content is generated.

      Yes it’s getting worse.

      Yes there’s lots of bots.

      However… you can choose where you spend your time online, and spend it with friends or likeminded people.

      What I mean to say is, some communities on reddit are “mostly dead”, but you don’t have to go there.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember when the narwhal used to bacon only at midnight.

    Now the narwhal is forced to bacon continuously.

    This kills the narwhal.

  • force@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Never trust a default username

    [adjective] [noun] [3-4 digits] is always a sign of bad news, on social media and Xbox Live

    • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Cutesy auto generated names are too useful for bots, the lazy, and fans of cutesy name combos.

      Should have made defaults your approximate IP geolocation. I’m kidding of course for privacy reasons, but a little similar motivation to think about a better name during creation couldn’t hurt (looking at Reddit here).

      Edit: but hey - maybe it’s not desirable for one to be able to distinguish users. I wonder… nah, Reddit would never… 😒

    • joneskind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      When you use “connect with Apple” it creates an account with a name constructed this way.

      You can change it afterwards but no one does.

      EDIT: Wait, is it the default Reddit way?

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I think any account you create now has that as the default. Or at least did a few years ago.

        So it’s really more of a “many new accounts are bots” rather than “you can distinguish bots by this account name format”.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reposts has always been a major issue on reddit, there are an infamous moderator who would delete posts with traction and repost it himself for karma.

    Using bots to duplicate comments on reposts is a new low though.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s definitely not a new issue, but it’s only gotten worse since reddit has gone more and more mainstream.

        If you follow me on Lemmy since last year, you should know that I’ve always been extremely against having bots posting here.

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve always been extremely against having bots posting here.

          As are all who live to see such times.

          Except certain transparent bots that serve a clear, particular purpose. Like, we could have a bot that adds a new honorific to your description every time someone says, “oh hey, I saw a Margot Robbie on TV! Is that you?”

          MargotRobbieHonorificBot: That’s Her Esteemed Greatness The GOAT Academy Award Deserver And Future Empress Of The High Seas Margot Robbie!

    • Tankton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      moderator who would delete posts with traction and repost it himself for karma

      I’ve had this happen to me, it felt so fucking wrong lol. My thread got deleted by the mod and he reposted it as a sticky on his own name without so much mentioning me.

    • DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I had almost forgotten about him. Wouldn’t he also post obvious ads to the hundreds of communities he moderated, and bend the rules so that technically the posts belong?

  • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 months ago

    We use manual approval for programming.dev accounts where there is a very simple instruction you must follow to be approved. The amount of spam that fails that test makes me concerned about the amount of bots from instances without any barriers for account creation.

    What happens on reddit (in regards to spam) will inevitably finds its way to ActivityPub link aggregators like lemmy.

    • sparr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I am sad that the current generation of federated social media/networks still doesn’t have much, if any, implementation of web of trust functionality. I believe that’s the only solution to bots/AI/etc content in the future. Show me content from people/accounts/profiles I trust, and accounts they trust, etc. When I see spam or scams or other misbehavior, show me the trust chain connecting me to it so I can sever it at the appropriate level instead of having to block individual accounts. (e.g. “sorry mom, you’ve trusted too many political frauds, I’m going to stop trusting people you trust”)

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          This concept reminds me of a certain browser extension that marks trans allies and transphobic accounts/websites using a user aggregate with thresholds that mark transphobes as red and trans allies as green.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I guess the question is how specifically you implement such a system, in this case for software like Lemmy. Should instances have a trust level with each other? Should you set a trust when you subscribe to a community? I’m not sure how you can make a solution that will be simple for users to use (and it needs to be simple for users, we can’t only have tech people on Lemmy).

        • sparr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          For the simplest users, my initial idea is just a binary “do you trust them?” for each person (aka “friends”) and non-person (aka “follow”), and maybe one global binary of “do you trust who they trust?” that defaults to yes. anything more complex than that can be optional.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            But how does this work when you follow communities? Do you need to trust every single poster in a community?

            • sparr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’d see posts in a community/group/etc based on your trust of the community, unless you’ve explicitly de-trusted the poster or you trust someone who de-trusts them (and you haven’t broken that chain).

              • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Right, so if I have no connection to someone else, it’d be “neutral” and I’d see the post. If I trust them transitively, then it would be a trusted post and if I distrust them transitively, it would be a distrusted post.

                I think implementing such a thing would not only be complicated but also quite computationally demanding - I mean you’d need to calculate all of this for every single user?

      • Blaze@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Definitely something that will emerge in the future once we’ll inevitable get bots here too

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes! Web of trust is the only way. Everything else can be scammed. I am kinda wondering if it could be invites and if severing could be automated for social media. “We just banned a third person who came in on your invitations. Goodbye.”

    • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly I already believe that this has happened.

      My reason for thinking this is because of this:

      The spike that happened on October 2023 after the initial spike that happened due to the Reddit protests seems unnatural to me.

      Someone gave the explanation of the release of the mobile clients but even then I wouldn’t think it would lead to a spike equivalent to the initial one since it would mostly just be people using an account they already had instead of creating a new one.

      Like honestly if someone knows what event happened then that made so many new users join I’d appreciate it.

  • PDFuego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s been happening for ages. I’m sure if you check the profiles you’ll find other posts with all the same bots commenting. A lot of lazier ones wait exactly a year to repost, and it’s pretty obvious in subs for something like a live service game where they’ll be reposting complaints that are way out of date. One in the Monster Hunter sub reposted a trailer for Iceborne which had been out for 3 years by that point.

  • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m mildly annoyed the recent thread is on the left not the right, but this is super interesting so thanks for sharing! 🤖

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just paid a visit. It’s really gotten bad. Horrible titles that make little sense. People falling over each other to make tired quips instead of conversation, and the rest to point out how someone is wrong or one-up the commenter.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 months ago

        IMO it’s gotten markedly worse since the 3rd party app debacle. Perhaps combined with the advent of AI added to bots has made it obvious. Yeah, it’s been on a decline for quite a bit with the repost bots repeating everything from posts to replies, but people would call them out. Now it’s like it’s bots all the way down or the remaining participants have resigned themselves to the decline.

        Small subs still seem mostly safe, but anything with decent participation is pretty bad.

        • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah the only real reason for Reddit for me anymore is sports discourse. E.g. the Baltimore Orioles are my MLB team. /r/Orioles on reddit has almost 80k members. Currently on the page there’s 62 people actively in the sub and that’s at 10am on a Wednesday, not during a game. The two Orioles communities on lemmy are Orioles@fanaticus.social and Baltimore Orioles@lemmy.world and they have 133 and 131 subscribers, respectively. There’s a bot posting game day threads and 0 comments in all of them. The only post not by a game day bot was 21 days ago.

          • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah I feel you, at least the Orioles team is super stacked rn though (speaking as a Yankees fan 🫠). !yankees@fanaticus.social is equally dead.

            My current thought process is that if we can get a decently active generalized baseball community going, it could provide a stepping stone to increasing the activity in the team-specific communities. I’m trying to be active on !mlb@lemmy.ml and !baseball@fanaticus.social as much as possible.

            There is already a latent population of sports fans on Lemmy, but it’s sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy that the communities aren’t active so people assume there must be no other fans.

            My other thought on this topic is that although I do miss the active fan discussion and game threads, the subreddits for essentially all of my teams were indisputably toxic cesspools. The whining, armchair GMing, scapegoating, and just completely idiotic takes were out of this world. So it’d be nice to have activity, but too much activity can also degrade the quality of discussion to the level of Twitter and just create a very toxic environment where fans are constantly arguing and complaining.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I switch between Mlem and Voyager (iOS). I like them both, but I tend to use Voyager more. Mlem tends to give me more variety of communities, I like Voyager’s layout.

      • Rivers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Reddit went to shit when the zoomers flooded in, arguably the late 90’s kids aswell

  • orangeboats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’ve noticed that many Reddit users with the username format Word_Word_Number (for example Absolute_Bot_1230) are almost guaranteed to either be a bot or extremely inflammatory – it’s like everything they post is meant to generate controversies.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah reddit has a name generator that you can choose from when you create an account and that’s the format it uses. Those names are almost exclusively bots and throwaway/anon accounts

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s Reddit’s automatic username generation, so either yeah, bots, or someone logging in through Google/Facebook and having a username assigned to them.

    • Syd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well yeah they even have bot in their username.

    • xyz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t get it. They already created a good bot network, but the username part is where they get lazy.

  • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just said on a Reddit r/worldnews’ thread that the subreddit has been astroturfed for years, as a response to someone wondering how could people in the comments be wishing for more innocent Palestinians be killed, and surprise surprise, I got instabanned. The site is becoming a façade of a fake reality in far more ways than one.

    • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I was permabanned from r/worldnews for saying we should give free meals to kids at schools here instead of wasting money blowing up other country’s kids.

  • mistrgamin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    r/FluentinFinance is just five different accounts made less than a year ago that reposting the same political twitter screenshots with the exact same titles that all get boosted to the front page every time. Idk if everyone there is too caught up in arguing the same points they made a week ago to notice or if everyone who eventually finds out gets banned.

  • cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    A strange thing on reddit is that if you make a new account and then make a comment that gets like 8 down votes then that new account gets shadow banned.

    They’ve implemented so many rules that it encourages new users to act in the same way as the hive mind. Where even if you are an actual user then you are indistinguishable from a bot. Basically you’ve become a living NPC.

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    Would be even hard to detect now that AI can write the same message in different ways. I question every comment I read, especially the ones appealing to one’s emotions.

    • Oneobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hang on a sec, how do we know you’re not a bot lol

      You raise a valid point. Hive mind and weaponising narrative is a danger to us all.

    • Fubarberry
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      As an AI language model, it would be highly irresponsible for me to impersonate users on a website. This action violates privacy rights by potentially accessing and misusing personal information. Impersonation involves deception, undermining trust in both the AI and the platform where it operates. Furthermore, it can have legal implications, such as violating terms of service agreements or privacy laws. Ultimately, engaging in impersonation could lead to negative publicity and damage the reputation of the AI and the platform it serves.

      /s

      • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get the sarcasm, but this is written as if there is one AI and the reality of who knows how many individually run instances all under whatever rules their implementers choose.