• tslnox@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes, because the police have never ever abused a power they’ve been given.

    • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yes, because even when police find and take opportunities to do their dangerous job safer than before, we should still have prepubescent dickheads find ways to remind us police bad. Who could ever grow tried of hearing “ACAB” at every mention of police?

      I bet the cop who got in a squirtgun fight with some local kids put lemon juice in his gun. Typical.

      • BReel@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not bad to be skeptical considering their record. It’s responsible. Yes. It’s good that they are doing something to make things more safe. But yes it’s also good to continue to call attention to the ways this new tech can (and almost certainly will) be abused.

        They dug their own hole of skepticism, not us.

        I don’t really care if someone’s “tired of hearing ACAB” if people are still losing their lives unjustly to bad cops. Continuing to raise awareness in any little way is better then not being annoying.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          Go ahead and be skeptical but there’s a difference between being a skeptic and being bias. You’re the latter.

            • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              8 months ago

              Man oh man it’s almost like I refuse to acknowledge someone’s opinion especially when they admit to having an inclination that inhibits impartial judgment stemming from prejudice.

              Man oh man.

              • SphereofWreckening@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                It’s not impartial judgement if the entire system for policing is built upon immunity: which it is. There are only extremely rare cases where police are held accountable, and usually only after massive backlash.

                Also there are biases in literally all opinions. No one is a perfectly logical human being. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel superior.

                • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Bro didn’t even know what the fuck bias meant and admitted he had one. Maybe stop talking if you don’t know what words mean.

                  • SphereofWreckening@ttrpg.network
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Mf thinks they’re clear of any and all biases while defending the police lmao. Have fun doing whatever the fuck lol