• Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    8 months ago

    Being evil doesn’t mean being an arsehole.

    In Kotor I would always help that Selkath guy on the first planet, it doesn’t mean I didn’t brutally conquer the galaxy with an army of endlessly producing ships.

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      8 months ago

      KotOR did the evil path so well. You get completely different quests by going evil with comparable rewards. Other games you get someone asking for help, saying no is the evil choice but all that does is lock you out of the quest and give up all rewards, not KotOR, in KotOR being evil pays off

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        For most games, the evil path is only created so the player technically has a choice, so they feel like they played a role in the path they took. In reality, most of the time there is truly only one fully developed path and the developers knew which you would take.

        I don’t want to call it lazy, because it isn’t and is just a smart use of resources. However, when a game actually fully fleshed out the evil path it is a work of wonder.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve noticed that, too, that often the “choice” is really a choice between doing content or not doing content. Sometimes this is true outside of good vs evil choices, too. Do you help this person? If you say no you just don’t get that mission. There’s no fallout by not helping someone in other words.

        I’d love to see more RPGs play with that (and I say that understanding how complicated and big of a task it is to do that)

        • Dagnet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Seems to be in developer hell for a while now, Id say the odds are low it wont suck

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Aye. Most of the good / bad responses in games are like “flatter and cuddle” vs “spit in the face, and threaten sodomy”. As Yahtzee said it’s eating babies or saving babies, and no nuance.

      Really evil is being friendly while lying to their face, then blowing up planet. Planescape Torment had the (lie) responses that were the closest I’ve seen.

      • Ragnarok314159
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is what made Starfield so terrible for me. The choices were always: be nice, be super duper nice, be boring and “whatever”, or say something mean, but not mean enough HR would even care.

    • Retrograde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This is all well and good/evil, but refusing to pet a dog is much more evil than siding with Selkath

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      That game had one of my favorite evil moments ever when you can force a certain character to do summering horrible. Even though it’s old I won’t spoil it because it’s getting a remake and a lot of people will get to play for the first time.

      But those who know what I’m talking about will remember that moment.