• Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I despise Starbucks, but I’m not sure this lawsuit makes any sense. Those non-cow milks costs them more. Of course, the law often doesn’t make sense, anyway.

    As another commenter said, they could just overcharge for cow milk and make the prices all the same. Then nobody is happy, but it meets the legal requirement (as I understand it).

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Those non-cow milks costs them more.

      so? it’s starbucks. they’ll be fine.

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Those non-cow milks costs them more.

        so? it’s starbucks. they’ll be fine.

        Great logic, but that means every coffee shop everywhere would have to cover the additional costs of being “compliant”.