Why are 3D printers still stuck on stepper motors? Why haven’t we transitioned to servo motors with encoder feedback for positioning?

Is it just too cost prohibitive for the consumer-level? We would be able to print a lot faster and more accurately if we had position feedback on the axes. Instead we just rely blindly on the stepper not skipping any steps when we tell it to move, hoping for the best.

  • DreadPotatoOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I mean, 3-axis robots move at 2000mm/s with 0.01mm accuracy with payloads weighing considerably more than 3D printer toolheads, using servos.

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yes. 2000m/s and 0.01mm accuracy unfortunately means nothing about acceleration and control.

      Knowing your system, you can achieve that with motors that can only accelerate at 0.01m/s² and that cannot brake.

      The 2000m/s and 0.01mm accuracy say nothing about the capability of the hardware in the case of multiple sudden direction changes.

      That’s like saying “this car has a top speed of 200mph, and can reach any GPS coordinates precisely, so of course it can zigzag from side to side using 160° turns in a one way street at high speeds.”

    • XTL
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      2 km/s? That’s almost Mach 6.

      • DreadPotatoOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah that was a typo, obviously that was supposed to say mm/s